Sometimes it is frustrating when one takes the trouble, an issue once detailed work up - and receives in response a polemic in three words.
So much anticipated: The function of an official censorship is not me. Therefore I am quite reserved when it comes to the deletion of comments on my blog. But if my large text, "The West, freedom and Islam - an overdue reply" is a response in just three words, which does not contain any substance, this is quite offensive but, then delete including me. Finally I'm here something like the householder in his own blog - and guests have to behave (oops, that reminds me now difficult to Födlibörger sayings after the Yes to expel the initiative, but that's another site, would say as Giovanni) .
A certain "Marti", who heroically may be hidden even behind a non-existing web address, had left for my replica just three words:
"Unfortunately, true blind item!"
Unfortunately, I can except a lack of ability to express these three words have not found concrete evidence for criticism. But I can speculate that said "Marti" his truth probably from other media together looking than me. Finally, it is reality when it relates to such complex issues, usually conveyed by the media and not the result of his own experiences.
that "Marti" leaves his comment scared anonymous says, also ensure that "Marti" in the clear no eggs added, but at what places - a chicken holding a chicken, which gagaga cackles, but do not want his words mag. This fits in with people who select their rooms world of fears, prejudices and half-information together. Motivate people like me "Marti" only even more: you do not have feet wide is to give the public debate, their demagoguery to be revealed as as their half-truths. Playing with religious hatred is too irresponsible to not rebel against it. And because the moderates are asking all sides to point to the extremists in their place.
0 comments:
Post a Comment