tagesschau.de given more time: "Nationwide has a child from the upper class against a student from a family of skilled workers also the same intelligence and ability to learn a 4.5-times greater chance of going to a school. Particularly pronounced is the social education gap in Baden-Wuerttemberg and Bavaria, where the chances of academic children to the same intelligence specialists children 6.6 and 6.5 times so high. "
Honestly, I know once you how the ominous figure 4.5 has come about. One of them writes on the other, but who has set them in the world? As an old high school teacher, I doubt that number easily. I base my doubts: first
If true 4.5, it would be a lot more academics at the high school kids than they actually are. Let us take the proportion of academics parents with children aged 10 years, once at 15-20% of the population, the proportion of skilled workers [What exactly is a skilled worker? Is this something other than a worker? If a bus driver, so a skilled worker?] At 40-50%, then we would have Ratio of academics parents to parents about skilled workers at 1:2.5, and then drawn up (assuming the same number of children in families) to the ominous size "4.5 times" the crowd of Sextans are distributed as follows: 60% Akademikersextaner, 30% Facharbeitersextaner, 10% scheduled for the rest. Whether this is so we can check - in my experience is not so.
second However, since probably get less talented high school graduates, the recommendation for children, the ratio would be even more skewed in their favor.
third Again provided the talented skilled workers' children who do not go to high school, went to all the secondary school - on the main school are probably at least in NRW hard to find highly talented technicians Children: Since going from nine well-talented skilled workers to high school would have only 2 children, ie 7 go to secondary school. If their parents now account for 40-50% of the population, would have around 30-40% of children of each age group children are talented skilled workers in high school. But since accommodate the high schools does not exceed 30-40% of all students, are expected in addition to the talented skilled workers' children are no other students from attending secondary school: no academic children, no less talented skilled workers' children, no children of workers, not immigrants, etc., only highly skilled technical workers' children.
Also this size would be easy to check, if such it was. Will you not: You want to attract prefers the injustice of the educational opportunities and then they fight with measures (longer shared learning "), whose success they could check in the city or the state of Berlin.
Will you also do not - the result could indeed be different than it needs for its education policy, is not it Löhrmann woman?
0 comments:
Post a Comment